1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 1,347 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (122 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mazda |
| Model | Mum 500 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 500 cc | 1347 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
