1993 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 25 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Sigma | C30 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2639 mm |
