1994 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Le Baron | 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Le Baron | Aurora |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2860 mm |