1994 Citroen AX vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Citroen AX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1994 Citroen AX. (48 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1994 Citroen AX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Citroen AX. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Citroen AX | 2010 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Citroen | Renault |
| Model | AX | Megane |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2630 mm |
