1994 Dodge Venom vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Dodge Venom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Dodge Venom would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Dodge Venom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 371 kg more than 1994 Dodge Venom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Dodge Venom (339 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 1994 Dodge Venom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Dodge Venom | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Venom | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 211 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1057 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |