1994 Dodge Venom vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Dodge Venom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Dodge Venom would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Dodge Venom is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1994 Dodge Venom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Dodge Venom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Dodge Venom (339 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1994 Dodge Venom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Dodge Venom | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Venom | 6 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |