1995 AC Ace vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 AC Ace (350 HP) has 280 more horse power than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2010 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2010 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 AC Ace (407 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (92 Nm). This means 1995 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 AC Ace | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | AC | Smart |
Model | Ace | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 1867 mm |