1995 BMW CLS vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | CLS | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2774 cc |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2660 mm |