1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1951 GAZ M-20
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1951 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1951 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1951 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 GAZ M-20 (125 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (111 Nm). This means 1951 GAZ M-20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1951 GAZ M-20 | |
Make | Fiat | GAZ |
Model | Bravo | M-20 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2120 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2710 mm |