1995 Fiat Cinquecento vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Cinquecento. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Cinquecento would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Cinquecento, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1995 Fiat Cinquecento has manual transmission. 1995 Fiat Cinquecento will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Cinquecento | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Cinquecento | Artic |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 704 cc | 3998 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3200 mm |