1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 2000 Mazda 626

To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Aerostar (134 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 370 kg more than 2000 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1995 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 626. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications: