1995 Honda Argento Viva vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 Honda Argento Viva is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1979 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Honda Argento Viva (188 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Honda Argento Viva should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Honda Argento Viva weights approximately 60 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Honda Argento Viva (237 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1995 Honda Argento Viva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Honda Argento Viva | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | Argento Viva | Celica |
Year Released | 1995 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2451 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 188 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2640 mm |