1995 Mazda 121 vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1995 Mazda 121 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 121 (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 121 should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 121 (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 121 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 121 | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 121 | 66 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1322 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |