1996 Audi A3 vs. 1971 BMW 2002
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A3 | 1971 BMW 2002 | |
| Make | Audi | BMW |
| Model | A3 | 2002 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 140 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
