1996 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2005 Pagani Zonda is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 216 more horse power than 1996 BMW M3. (326 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 338 kg more than 2005 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2005 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | BMW | Pagani |
Model | M3 | Zonda |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 542 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2730 mm |