1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2012 Volvo S60

To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 354 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3.

Because 1996 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (275 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW Z3 2012 Volvo S60
Make BMW Volvo
Model Z3 S60
Year Released 1996 2012
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2926 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 201 HP 0 HP
Torque 275 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3950 RPM 1250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1255 kg 1609 kg
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 4628 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1864 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 L 67 L