1996 Buick LeSabre vs. 1962 MG 1100
To start off, 1996 Buick LeSabre is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick LeSabre (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1962 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1962 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 665 kg more than 1962 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Buick LeSabre | 1962 MG 1100 | |
Make | Buick | MG |
Model | LeSabre | 1100 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2380 mm |