1996 Fiat Panda vs. 1970 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Fiat Panda is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Panda. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 256 kg more than 1996 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Panda. (58 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Panda | 1970 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Panda | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 769 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 58 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 684 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2210 mm |