1996 Ford Galaxy vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1996 Ford Galaxy is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Galaxy weights approximately 424 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Galaxy | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Galaxy | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2295 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1724 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2980 mm |