1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1974 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher.
Because 1974 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Belmont. (263 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1974 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | XU 6 | Belmont |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 263 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
