1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2013 BMW X6
To start off, 2013 BMW X6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X6 (296 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (225 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X6 weights approximately 522 kg more than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 407 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2013 BMW X6 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | Grand Cherokee | X6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 407 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1648 kg | 2170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2195 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 85 L |