1996 Mercury Villager vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1996 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 200 kg more than 1996 Mercury Villager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Villager | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Villager | Endeavor |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2790 mm |