1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2010 Renault Thalia
To start off, 2010 Renault Thalia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Renault Thalia. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Thalia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Thalia. (105 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Thalia. 2010 Renault Thalia has automatic transmission and 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma has manual transmission. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Thalia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2010 Renault Thalia | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Carisma | Thalia |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 105 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1439 mm |