1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur weights approximately 370 kg more than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Silver Spur | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2470 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2120 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 108 L | 109 L |
