1996 Rover 400 vs. 2010 Honda Stream
To start off, 2010 Honda Stream is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Stream (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Stream should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 400 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2010 Honda Stream.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 400 (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Stream. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Stream.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Rover 400 | 2010 Honda Stream | |
Make | Rover | Honda |
Model | 400 | Stream |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2690 mm |