1996 Toyota Carina vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Carina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Carina would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Carina. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Carina.
Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Toyota Carina | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Carina | Mustang |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1425 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |