1997 Caterham C21 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1997 Caterham C21 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Caterham C21 (250 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 605 kg more than 1997 Caterham C21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Caterham C21. (252 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Caterham C21.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Caterham C21 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Caterham | Jaguar |
Model | C21 | XK |
Year Released | 1997 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2600 mm |