1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (229 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Grand Voyager | UTE |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 229 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |