1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 432 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 365 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (728 Nm) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Mustang | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Mustang | XK |
Year Released | 1997 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 590 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 728 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2600 mm |