1997 Ford Royale vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2006 Subaru Forester is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Royale would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Subaru Forester (227 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1997 Ford Royale. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Royale.
Because 2006 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Ford Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Subaru Forester (320 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Royale. (173 Nm). This means 2006 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Royale | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Royale | Forester |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 227 HP |
Torque | 173 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |