1997 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1997 Jeep Cherokee.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jeep Cherokee | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Jeep | Fisker |
Model | Cherokee | Karma |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3160 mm |