1997 Lancia K vs. 2003 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2003 Toyota Mark II is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lancia K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lancia K would be higher. At 1,993 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Lancia K is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1997 Lancia K. (155 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1997 Lancia K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 130 kg more than 1997 Lancia K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Lancia K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Lancia K. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Lancia K. 2003 Toyota Mark II has automatic transmission and 1997 Lancia K has manual transmission. 1997 Lancia K will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Mark II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Lancia K | 2003 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | K | Mark II |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |