1997 Mazda 626 vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1997 Mazda 626 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1997 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda 626 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda 626 (145 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda 626 | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | 626 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2210 mm |
