1997 Mazda MPV vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda MPV (146 HP) has 76 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda MPV weights approximately 982 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda MPV (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mazda MPV | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | MPV | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2954 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 1810 mm |