1997 Mazda MS-9 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda MS-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda MS-9 would be higher. Both 1997 Mazda MS-9 and 2010 Cadillac CTS are equipped with a 3,000 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 136 kg more than 1997 Mazda MS-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda MS-9 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | MS-9 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1842 mm |
