1997 MCC Smart vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (405 HP) has 352 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | MCC | Mercury |
Model | Smart | Comet |
Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 6393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 405 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1880 mm |