1997 MCC Smart vs. 2000 Nissan Almera

To start off, 2000 Nissan Almera is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Almera (108 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Almera weights approximately 556 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Nissan Almera has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Nissan Almera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: