1997 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 220 kg more than 1997 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1997 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1997 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercedes-Benz E | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | E | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 7446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2960 mm |