1997 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,378 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser (176 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Land Cruiser | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3378 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |
