1998 AC Cobra vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 AC Cobra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 AC Cobra (365 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1004 kg more than 1998 AC Cobra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 AC Cobra | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Cobra | 62 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 365 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 75 L |