1998 Acura Integra vs. 1962 Austin A 60
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (140 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura Integra (172 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1998 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1962 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Acura | Austin |
Model | Integra | A 60 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 122 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2550 mm |