1998 Acura Integra vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 191 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro (291 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 1981 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | Integra | Camaro |
Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1835 cc | 4375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 291 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |