1998 Acura Integra vs. 2011 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2011 Smart ForTwo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (140 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2011 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2011 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2011 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura Integra (172 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Smart ForTwo. (92 Nm). This means 1998 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 2011 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Acura | Smart |
Model | Integra | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 92 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1867 mm |