1998 Audi AD vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Audi AD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (352 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD. 2012 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1998 Audi AD has manual transmission. 1998 Audi AD will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | AD | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |