1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1982 Lancia Trevi
To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Trevi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Trevi would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Trevi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Trevi (100 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Trevi should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lancia Trevi weights approximately 329 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Lancia Trevi (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Lancia Trevi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 1982 Lancia Trevi | |
Make | Audi | Lancia |
Model | AL2 | Trevi |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2550 mm |