1998 Ford Puma vs. 1962 Opel Kapitan
To start off, 1998 Ford Puma is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Opel Kapitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Opel Kapitan would be higher. At 2,605 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Opel Kapitan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Opel Kapitan weights approximately 248 kg more than 1998 Ford Puma.
Because 1962 Opel Kapitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Opel Kapitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Puma | 1962 Opel Kapitan | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Puma | Kapitan |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 2605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1258 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |