1998 Ford Puma vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Puma weights approximately 300 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1998 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 1998 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Puma | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Puma | Minica |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |