1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (664 HP) has 307 more horse power than 2008 Holden UTE. (357 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (773 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | CLK LM | UTE |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 664 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 773 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
