1998 Renault Clio vs. 1954 Rover P4
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Rover P4 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1954 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 1954 Rover P4 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | P4 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1954 |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2830 mm |