1998 Saturn SC vs. 2000 Saturn L
To start off, 2000 Saturn L is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Saturn SC would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saturn L (135 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1998 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1998 Saturn SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Saturn L weights approximately 293 kg more than 1998 Saturn SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Saturn L (193 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Saturn SC. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Saturn SC | 2000 Saturn L | |
| Make | Saturn | Saturn |
| Model | SC | L |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1338 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2710 mm |
